Marry AI usage data to your systems of record, like your CRM, so each AI effort shows what it changed in the business.
SightLift joins AI usage to the metrics your business already runs on.
An AI effort is a skill, an agent, or a way of working that shows up in your usage data: a follow-up deck skill, a renewal-prep agent, an enrichment step. Each one is measured by the KPI it should move: pipeline velocity, win rate, campaign conversion, NRR.
SightLift finds the cluster of usage behind each effort, then lines it up with the records it touched in your CRM: the deals, accounts, and campaigns. Compare the records the AI activity touched with the ones it did not, and the difference is the lift.
Every effort is tagged the way your business runs: team, skill and version, account, period, and the topics you define with us. So you can ask a specific question, like how the renewal team did on the v3 skill last quarter, and get a real answer about your business.
Start on the ROI view, then drill one skill to the deals it touched.
This demo runs on sample data. Click around the way you would in the product.
The Cost Drill
Monthly spend
Axis starts at $5K
By team · Aug
SightLift recommendation
Cut the cost per deck, keep the 9-day lift
71% of each run is agent overhead: data retrieval and tool calls on the most expensive model. Two changes fix that:
No change to manage for deck output, prospects, or sellers.
Return check
9 days faster · demo → close CRM connectedDemo → close · days · this month
62 demos this month: 38 with a deck, 24 without · significant at p < 0.01.
Deals with a deck close 9 days faster and convert 41% vs 28% from demo to proposal. Now that the skill works, let’s economize it.
Every run is a real conversation: the deals, the reps, and the dollars.
DashboardEnterprise Sales · +$3.1K unprojectedPost-demo deck skill
SightLift runs cost analysis on real usage data, so you can audit spend down to the individual conversation, and the return it produced.
Conversations 214 Showing 25 costliest Avg, all runs ~$12.40 Skill total ~$2.7K/mo
Runs & spend by rep · top 5
| Conversation | Rep | Tool calls | Tokens | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Northwind renewal · follow-up deck | J. Alvarez | 96 | 1.9M | ~$19.40 |
| Acme Industrial · follow-up deck | M. Chen | 88 | 1.8M | ~$18.10 |
| Bright & Co expansion · follow-up deck | J. Alvarez | 81 | 1.7M | ~$17.20 |
| Meridian Health · follow-up deck | R. Ortiz | 74 | 1.6M | ~$16.50 |
| Stonepath Logistics · follow-up deck | M. Chen | 69 | 1.5M | ~$15.30 |
| …and 189 more · Full CSV export available | ||||
About $12 a deck, 214 decks a month: a ~$2.7K monthly run rate that doubled month over month and is still spreading.
A shareable brief: the numbers, the fix, and the follow-up, ready to send.
The skill works and it’s spreading. 11 reps, 214 runs this month, and deals with a deck close 9 days faster (from your connected CRM, p < 0.01). Cut the cost per run before it scales to every team.
SightLift re-checks cost per run and demo → close time in two weeks and updates this document if the evidence moves.
Your real data drills exactly like this.